Other people's reponse
“Tencent is always plagiarizing, but never get a lawsuit.”(Unknow,
2010)
Here is a video create by a Youtuber, and she covered some unethical actions Tencent did on its early years as well:Tencent: One of the Shadiest Gaming Tech Giants
Most of the comments from bloggers and editorialist about
Tencent are critical, especially the comments from other game developer and
coding programmer. “Although Tencent has become one of the biggest IT companies
and doing all kinds of business in all field, the way it defeats its competitors
is still called plagiarism” (Bo, 2010). In 2003, Lianzhong Game platform’s
develop noticed Tencent launched a “twin” game platform which is very similar
to Lianzhong. The CEO of Lianzhong, Mr. Bao realized the threaten, however,
instead of sending Tencent a lawsuit, he was trying to negotiate with the
current manager in Tencent and ask for collaboration. However, Bao’s kindness
does not turn in to good outcome, the current chief officer of Tencent refuse to
meet Bao. “Unlike other massively online game, the rule of online chess and card
games are fixed, which the code is not complicated enough. Also the most of the
players are also QQ users, therefore, my platform is very easy to be copy and plagiarism
by big company such as Tencent”, said by Bao
There are also other comments on Tencent’s other unethical actions,
the leak of user’s information. Since the most featured function of WeChat is
WeChat pay, in China, the most commonly used
payment method are WeChat Pay and Alipay(Developed by Alibaba), in other word,
WeChat Pay and AliPay has oligopoly and evenly split the China online convenient
payment market share, since we can hardly find the store which will accept
other online payment include PayPal, Apple pay or Samsung pay. Since in order
to make a successful payment or transaction, WeChat required user to input
password or scan face, and nowadays, people with the phone has the face recognize
function will setting the verification via face scanning. However, based on the
report, Tencent will not protect the face photos scanned through the phone,
instead, Tencent will provide this information to the police in some cases
My option on Tencent bullying and plagiarism other small companies is the higher level must involve with the software application developing decision, since every successful big company with huge market share cannot operate without the control of the higher level. However, since when the management team receive the approval from the development team that involved other companies design idea, the only reason they did not deny the approval is they see the profit behind this action.
References
Cook, S. (2019, March 28). Worried about Huawei?
Take a closer look at Tencent. Retrieved from The Japan times:
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2019/03/28/commentary/world-commentary/worried-huawei-take-closer-look-tencent/
Xu, L. (2010, July 24). 计算机世界:“狗日的”腾讯 搅局者还是终结者. Retrieved from Sina Technology:
http://tech.sina.com.cn/i/2010-07-24/20434467150.shtml
Why didn't Mr. Bao sue Tencent after the company refused to negotiate with him? Is Tencent rich enough to quiet it's competitors? Also, did Tencent leak other information of it's users besides photos? I am a little confused about that.
ReplyDeleteI think there are two reasons Mr. Bao did not sue Tencent: first, by 2003, Tencent already have huge amount of user in using its messenger QQ, but Mr. Bao only had a platform can play mini games by that time, therefore, when Tencent launched QQ game, there were user outflow from Bo's platform to QQ game. Second, the fee of hiring a lawyer is expensive in 2003, for the startup companies this expense is unaffordable.
DeleteBy 2003, Tencent's QQ is the only online chat software we had, therefore, my guess is Tencent held more market share back to 2003 than nowadays, so yes, Tencent was too rich back to 2003 to fight with.
WeChat is also leak the chat content of its users to police, due to some sensitive topic contended.
Quick question for you. If you were an employee of Tencent and had knowledge about their plagiarizing techniques, would you be a whistleblower? I find it very unjust for a company to continue manipulating these small companies of their rights and discrediting them. If it was me, I would try to suggest a more ethical way before I part ways from the company.
ReplyDeleteIf I were an employee of Tencent, I will suggest the management to make the ethical choice. However, in reality, I will not work for a company without moral standing or bottomline.
DeleteThe only thing I can't wrap my head around is the fact that employees wouldn't take the opportunity to report this issue. The majority of the time companies with a bigger abundance of money tend to cut out any competitors they have to go against. Also, do you think that companies like Tencent should be taken out of the industry? In my personal opinion, I would try to eliminate any companies that use money as a way of manipulating smaller companies.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that company like Tencent should be wiped out of the industry, however, Tencent's technology now is in every aspects in Chinese people's life, include social media, a new payment method, buying the movie ticket, etc.
Delete